Google
 

Friday, July 20, 2007

Wow

According to this :

NEW YORK -- The FBI is investigating allegations that a veteran NBA referee bet on basketball games over the past two seasons, including ones in which he officiated.

According to a law enforcement official, authorities are examining whether the referee made calls to affect the point spread in games on which he or associates had wagered.

The investigation first was reported Friday by the New York Post.

The law enforcement official, who spoke to the AP on Friday on condition of anonymity, said the referee was aware of the investigation and had made arrangements to surrender as early as next week to face charges. The official, who did not identify the referee, is familiar with the investigation but was not authorized to speak publicly about the ongoing investigation.

The law enforcement official said the bets involved thousands of dollars and were made on games during the 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 seasons.

In a statement issued Friday, the NBA said: "We have been asked by the FBI, with whom we are working closely, not to comment on this matter at this time."

The probe, which began recently, also involves allegations that the referee had connections to organized crime associates. Other arrests are expected, the official said.

The referee had a gambling problem, according to the official, and was approached by low-level mob associates through an acquaintance.

"These accusations, if true, are extremely serious and we have been in discussions with the NBA regarding this matter," Lamell McMorris, head of the NBA Referees Association, told Bloomberg News. "In light of the fact that this is an ongoing federal criminal investigation, we have nothing further to say at this time."

******

This would be as big as the Pete Rose gambling issue in baseball. The NBA has had a major problem with officials for a long time now. Everybody knows this, from the people in the stands to the people watching on tv to guys like Mark Cuban who actually can do something about it.

Refs tend to be very stubborn people. Almost by necessity, they have to think they are always right which can make attempts to scrutinize there calls risky. It is precisely because of things like this though it any league body has to take every possible measure to insure the sanctity/competitive balance of their games. Refs are people, they make mistakes, they can be bought. This has been a problem in NCAA basketball for years, refs being bought to change the point spreads/outcomes of games.

I hope David Stern will actually do the right thing, get to the bottom of this. Ruthlessly research every ref in the game...not just the one implicated in this FBI probe. If there's a hint, the smallest inkling of impropriety, fire them. This has the potential to be Kobe raping a white girl/brawl at Aurburn Hills/Spree choking Carlisimo together, times a million.

This could get messy...

1 comment:

Lincoln said...

Very well said Lincoln. Krevor here with my take. This is extremly bad for the NBA. The rules of the NBA make it so that foul calls are sooo subjective that a ref could easily favor one team or player (see Michael Jordan or Dwayne Wade in the 2006 finals) and the league would do nothing about it because they could not prove anything. Football has largly corrected this problem due to instant replay and baseball could be vulnerable to this but it is easier to tell if a pitch was in a zone or if a runner got to the base before a tag than it is to tell how hard a player hit another. Contact occurs all the time in the NBA and whether a foul is called or not is completly subjective. This could get real messy, especially if this guy worked in the 2006 finals. I am actually happy to hear this because the NBA is so smug when it fines any coach or player for making a remark about an official. Now it seems that the fix is in and the NBA needs to rethink how it handles player, coach, and owner criticism on refs. Mark Cuban may have been right all along.